Sunday, December 22, 2019

Functional Perspective on Group Decision Making - 940 Words

FUNCTIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON GROUP DECISION MAKING WHAT IS FUNCTIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON GROUP DECISION-MAKING Functional Perspective on Group Decision-making is a theory developed by Randy Hirokawa and Dennis Gouran. Miller(2011) stated that both of them have an interest in small group communication, so they worked it put and produced this theory. They seek to understand how communication processes contribute to decision making and problem solving in groups. They come to a question, â€Å"Why do some groups make good decisions while others make bad ones?† The theorists assume that the group members of the group who cares about the issue are intelligent, and face a challenging task. They stressed that communication or the term they†¦show more content†¦Without such criteria, it is likely that the decision will be driven by politics rather than reason. 3. Identification of Alternatives Again, according to Griffin(2011), it is the generation of options to sufficiently solve the problem. The group members who set their their goal for the decision needs to think of ways to make and reach their goal as many as possible. 4. Evaluation of Positive and Negative Characteristics Last but not the least, according to Griffin(2011), in this function happens the testing of the relative merits of each option against the criteria selected. The group weighs the benefits and costs of the alternatives they have decided. Hirokawa notes that some group task have positive bias and negative bias. Positive bias is the spotting the favorable characteristics of alternative choices is more important than identifying negative qualities. In this aspect, the members uses easy but reasonable choices in order to meet their goal. Meanwhile, negative bias is the unattractive characteristics of candidates carry more weight that the positive the attributes. This aspect is the other way around, the decisions they have chosen were unattractive, or may call as difficult ones, but this choices weighs more and produces outcomes that reaches their goal compared to their positive attributes. THE ROLE OF COMMUNICATION IN FULFILLING THE FUNCTIONS Communication or theShow MoreRelatedFunctional Perspective On Group Decision Making1259 Words   |  6 PagesFunctional Perspective on Group Decision Making is the communication theory by Randy Hirokawa and Dennis Gouran that focuses on the guidelines that groups of people should take to have an effective communication, to complete the task. Working within a group can become frustrating, coordination can be annoying and gathering people to make a group decision can be difficult to achieve, but Hirokawa and Gouran have set up guidelines to help make the process of reaching these decisions in an easier andRead MoreSmall Group Decision Making And Functional Perspective Theory1843 Words   |  8 Pages Small Group Decision Making and Functional Perspective Theory Randy Hirokawa and Dennis Gouran developed the Functional Perspective on Group Decision Making theory to â€Å"offer practical advice on how participants can act to ensure better group decisions† (Hirokawa, 1999, p. 170). They believe that as long as the members in a group care about the issue and are reasonably intelligent, the group interaction will have a positive effect on the final decision. In order for a group to reach a high-qualityRead MoreDifferent Types Of Work Teams1170 Words   |  5 Pagessimply a group of employees that work together to achieve a common goal. This type of work group can be on either a temporary or a permanent basis depending on the particular task. Usually, when a short-term project ends so does the team formed to achieve it. However, there are instances where specific team scan be formed to be permanent such as a hospital’s steering committee or law enforcement’s task force (Wilson’s Perspective Diary, 2013). Cross-Functional Teams: a cross-functional work teamRead MoreSmall Group Communication : An Effective Communication958 Words   |  4 Pages2015 COMM 2110 Small Group Analysis Paper 1. Small Group Communication The small group communication is an interpersonal communication within groups between thirty to twenty individuals. It is very important to have a quality communication such as information-sharing behavior and helping attitude among the members of group. The positive attitude and productive relationship between the group members help in increasing the performance of group. For quality communication, all the group members are requiredRead MoreDepartment Of Marketing And Entrepreneurship895 Words   |  4 PagesSweety Law Business Communication Department of Marketing Entrepreneurship California State University Eastbay Organization Structure Prepared By Vivek Dandu Content i. Introduction ii. Organization structure iii. Team Management iv. Functional Organization structure v. References Business Research Report I. Introduction: Organization structure is a system of frame work which clearly defines roles and responsibilities of each job for attaining organization goals withRead MoreStrategic Human Resource Management1738 Words   |  7 PagesIn a management context, the word ‘strategy’ has now replaced the more traditional term – ‘long-term planning’ – to denote a specific pattern of decisions and actions undertaken by the upper echelon of the organization in order to accomplish performance goals. Wheelen and Hunger (1995, p. 3) define strategic management as ‘that set of managerial decisions and actions that determines the long-run performance of a corporation’. Hill and Jones (2001, p. 4) take a similar view when they define strategyRead MoreOrganizational Communication Is The Flow Of Messages Within A Network Of Interdependent Relationships1187 Words   |  5 Pagesground managing the company. Functional Perspective Theory on Group Decision Making Functional Perspective Theory is a prescriptive approach that describes and predicts group-task performance when four communication functions - problem analysis, goal setting, identification of alternatives, and evaluation of characteristics - are fulfilled. These functions are prioritized through logical progression of the group. There are many obstacles that a group faces in decision making, such as ignorance of issuesRead MoreCreating Cross Functional Teams For A Functional Team904 Words   |  4 PagesChapter Eight: What is the key to creating cross-functional teams in which team members put the good of the team ahead of functional self-interest? A team is a group of individuals who works for the common goal and they contribute to achieve a unique and common objective. Cross-functional teams where members come from different departments and backgrounds to achieve a common unique goal. The cross-functional team requires hand of top management support and commitment, specific goals and incentivesRead More5methods of Departmentalization1216 Words   |  5 Pagesï » ¿Essay Topic â€Å"What five methods have traditionally been used to departmentalize work and worker? Give one advantage and one disadvantage of each. Provide an example of functional departmentalization at your University and using the definitions in your textbook explain why it is suitable example. (Chapter 9)† In any size of the organization or complexity workplace, organizational structures are very important factors that the businesses must have, so the employee will know their position, theirRead MoreDifference Between Personnel Manager and Hr Manager637 Words   |  3 Pagesare many differences between them. Some are listed below: i) Nature of relations: The nature of relations can be seen through two different perspective views which are Pluralist and Unitarist. There is a clear distinct difference between both because the personnel manager, the focus is more on individualistic where individual interest is more than group interest. Here, HR manager through a shared vision between management and staff create a corporate vision and mission which are linked to business

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.